Posts

Trump Announces Plan To DESTROY Education, Eliminate 490,000 Teacher Jobs (DETAILS)

When the President elect was in Florida, he said about the Education Department:
There is so much waste. But that is not all. He intends to decimate at the Environmental Protection Agency, too. Why? He needs to pay for his “billionaires-first” tax plan. So, what would Trump’s plan do to the Department of Education? According to the CAPAF, eight million low-income students, or the equivalent of New York City’s population, would lose millions in college grants. The nearly half million teaching jobs would disappear; that’s 14 percent of all kindergarten through high school teachers across the country. CAPAF says that killing all those jobs would be the same as: UPS, one of the country’s largest employers, with over 350,000 American workers—going out of business. trump-this-is-the-day-we-take-our-country-back According to the think tank, this would be the actual results of demolishing the Department of Education:
8 million students every year would lose Pell grants 490,000 or more teacher positions could be eliminated $1.3 trillion in student loans would be at risk 9 million low-income students would lose $15 billion of Title I funding annually 5 million children and students with disabilities would lose $12.7 billion used every year to ensure that they receive a quality education 750,000 or more students from military families, Native American students, students living in U.S. territories, and students living on federal property or Native American lands would lose $1.1 billion per year for their school 4,000 or more rural school districts would lose more than $175 million used annually to help improve the quality of teaching and learning in many hard-to-staff schools $700 million used by states to support the 5 million English language learners currently in public schools—representing close to 10 percent of all students—would be cut.
Other factors that would go by the wayside are the federal guarantees of equality in “race, income, language, and disability” in public education. A recent CBO [Congressional Budget Office] report indicated: U.S. high school graduation rates are hitting all-time highs, dropout rates are at historical lows, college going rates are close to the highest they have ever been and test scores across the country are improving. But the elimination of the protections and resources from the Department of Education could significantly hinder or even reverse these gains. The federal government has helped “states and school districts fill funding gaps created by the Great Recession.” That means under Trump, states like:
Pennsylvania and Ohio—which were dramatically hard hit by this recession—would each lose well over $ 2 billion annually in federal education funding. Discarding the budget of the Department of Education, which is under $70 billion, would be a fraction of the Trump billionaire’s tax plan’s budget of “$9.5 trillion 10-year price tag.” It is no surprise that Trump forgot about his “earlier pledge to make education a top priority of the federal government.” President Ronald Reagan thought it would be a good idea to get rid of the Department of Education as a “source of major savings,” but then he had to re institute the department.
Reagan’s 1983 report “A Nation at Risk,” told people the failure to:
Deliver quality elementary and secondary education gave rise to “a rising tide of mediocrity” and recommended that it was “essential … for government at all levels to affirm its responsibility for nurturing the Nation’s intellectual capital.
CAPAF believes that the support and protection of our country’s students should be a priority, no matter who is president. Trump’s plan for cutting the Department of Education:
To sacrifice resources for America’s students—particularly the most vulnerable—to pay for tax cuts that would unduly benefit the country’s top earners is as shortsighted as it is callous. That is what happens when people elect a man with no empathy nor concern for the average citizen.
Sorry, but nothing matched your search criteria. Please try again with some different keywords.

Donald Trump’s little daughter (PHOTOS)

Donald Trump’s youngest daughter, Tiffany is 23 years old and just graduated at the University of Pennsylvania.

She is the only child Donald has with his second wife Marla Ann Maples. Tiffany is a fashion model and an extremely popular in the social media.

At the start of Trump’s presidential campaign she was forbidden to post pictures online, however now it’s all up to her.

15032617_1062120697241183_1268101841_n

15045543_1062120700574516_1060621496_n

15045832_1062120693907850_882360454_n

15058024_1062120663907853_2028160351_n

WikiLeaks: Julian Assange Statement on the US Election (FULL LETTER)

In recent months, WikiLeaks and I personally have come under enormous pressure to stop publishing what the Clinton campaign says about itself to itself. That pressure has come from the campaign’s allies, including the Obama administration, and from liberals who are anxious about who will be elected US President.

On the eve of the election, it is important to restate why we have published what we have.

The right to receive and impart true information is the guiding principle of WikiLeaks – an organization that has a staff and organizational mission far beyond myself. Our organization defends the public’s right to be informed.

This is why, irrespective of the outcome of the 2016 US Presidential election, the real victor is the US public which is better informed as a result of our work.

The US public has thoroughly engaged with WikiLeaks’ election related publications which number more than one hundred thousand documents. Millions of Americans have poured over the leaks and passed on their citations to each other and to us. It is an open model of journalism that gatekeepers are uncomfortable with, but which is perfectly harmonious with the First Amendment.

We publish material given to us if it is of political, diplomatic, historical or ethical importance and which has not been published elsewhere. When we have material that fulfills this criteria, we publish. We had information that fit our editorial criteria which related to the Sanders and Clinton campaign (DNC Leaks) and the Clinton political campaign and Foundation (Podesta Emails). No-one disputes the public importance of these publications. It would be unconscionable for WikiLeaks to withhold such an archive from the public during an election.

At the same time, we cannot publish what we do not have. To date, we have not received information on Donald Trump’s campaign, or Jill Stein’s campaign, or Gary Johnson’s campaign or any of the other candidates that fufills our stated editorial criteria. As a result of publishing Clinton’s cables and indexing her emails we are seen as domain experts on Clinton archives. So it is natural that Clinton sources come to us.

We publish as fast as our resources will allow and as fast as the public can absorb it.

That is our commitment to ourselves, to our sources, and to the public.

This is not due to a personal desire to influence the outcome of the election. The Democratic and Republican candidates have both expressed hostility towards whistleblowers. I spoke at the launch of the campaign for Jill Stein, the Green Party candidate, because her platform addresses the need to protect them. This is an issue that is close to my heart because of the Obama administration’s inhuman and degrading treatment of one of our alleged sources, Chelsea Manning. But WikiLeaks publications are not an attempt to get Jill Stein elected or to take revenge over Ms Manning’s treatment either.

Publishing is what we do. To withhold the publication of such information until after the election would have been to favour one of the candidates above the public’s right to know.

This is after all what happened when the New York Times withheld evidence of illegal mass surveillance of the US population for a year until after the 2004 election, denying the public a critical understanding of the incumbent president George W Bush, which probably secured his reelection. The current editor of the New York Times has distanced himself from that decision and rightly so.

The US public defends free speech more passionately, but the First Amendment only truly lives through its repeated exercise. The First Amendment explicitly prevents the executive from attempting to restrict anyone’s ability to speak and publish freely. The First Amendment does not privilege old media, with its corporate advertisers and dependencies on incumbent power factions, over WikiLeaks’ model of scientific journalism or an individual’s decision to inform their friends on social media. The First Amendment unapologetically nurtures the democratization of knowledge. With the Internet, it has reached its full potential.

Yet, some weeks ago, in a tactic reminiscent of Senator McCarthy and the red scare, Wikileaks, Green Party candidate Stein, Glenn Greenwald and Clinton’s main opponent were painted with a broad, red brush. The Clinton campaign, when they were not spreading obvious untruths, pointed to unnamed sources or to speculative and vague statements from the intelligence community to suggest a nefarious allegiance with Russia. The campaign was unable to invoke evidence about our publications—because none exists.

In the end, those who have attempted to malign our groundbreaking work over the past four months seek to inhibit public understanding perhaps because it is embarrassing to them – a reason for censorship the First Amendment cannot tolerate. Only unsuccessfully do they try to claim that our publications are inaccurate.

WikiLeaks’ decade-long pristine record for authentication remains. Our key publications this round have even been proven through the cryptographic signatures of the companies they passed through, such as Google. It is not every day you can mathematically prove that your publications are perfect but this day is one of them.

We have endured intense criticism, primarily from Clinton supporters, for our publications. Many long-term supporters have been frustrated because we have not addressed this criticism in a systematic way or responded to a number of false narratives about Wikileaks’ motivation or sources. Ultimately, however, if WL reacted to every false claim, we would have to divert resources from our primary work.

WikiLeaks, like all publishers, is ultimately accountable to its funders. Those funders are you. Our resources are entirely made up of contributions from the public and our book sales. This allows us to be principled, independent and free in a way no other influential media organization is. But it also means that we do not have the resources of CNN, MSNBC or the Clinton campaign to constantly rebuff criticism.

Yet if the press obeys considerations above informing the public, we are no longer talking about a free press, and we are no longer talking about an informed public.

Wikileaks remains committed to publishing information that informs the public, even if many, especially those in power, would prefer not to see it. WikiLeaks must publish. It must publish and be damned.

By Julian Assange
Source: CO

Analysis: Why the Democrats are voting for Trump, and the Republicans for Hillary

Here we are one day before the election day in the United States, and we are also facing a very absurd political situation.

Apparently the members of the Democratic party are hoping that Mr. Donald J. Trump is going to win this election cycle and the members of the Republican party are hoping that Secretary Hillary Clinton is actually going to win on Tuesday’s election day.

Why this is happening ?

  • For example if Hillary Clinton wins, one half of her mandate she will have to explain that she didn’t leaked Top Secret government documents and she will face the opportunity to get an impeachment, just like the case with the former U.S. president Mr. Richard M. Nixon that happened 30 or more years ago. That’s why the democrats believe that maybe it is better for the Democratic party Hillary to lose these very dirty elections 58th elections in the U.S.
  • On the other hand the republicans are making their own political calculations, because if Trump wins “as he is” – no one can control him – with occasional “very crazy” statements, he can do a lot more damage to the Republican party that supported him if he wins.

This means if Hillary wins and she gets impeached after two years, at least in the next two upcoming presidential elections they will be a very serious favorite to win.

Now I ask this heavy question, do you think that the Jews and Israel are having their revenge on Hillary Clinton because she made some mistakes according to their estimations ?

vote-collage

Lifeinvader

You may not, except with linking the source, distribute or commercially exploit the content. Nor may you transmit it or store it in any other website or other form of electronic retrieval system.

VIDEO: The man who tried to kill Donald J. Trump

Documents Say Teen Wanted to ‘Shoot and Kill Trump’ | Authorities say Michael Sandford, 19, tried to grab a police officer’s gun at a June rally in Las Vegas.

And attempted attack on Donald Trump during rally at hanger at Dayton international airport. To use this video in broadcast or in a media player contact .

The Lion’s Guard” called on supporters of the GOP front-runner to join a make-shift militia, Donald Trump attack in Dayton Ohio – YouTube Video for trump .

The man arrested for trying to disarm a police officer inside a Donald Trump rally in Las Vegas Saturday told authorities he intended to use the gun to shoot candidate Donald J. Trump.

FULL VIDEO: Donald J. Trump Assassination Attempt Fails Nevada 11/5/16

A crazed man at the Donald Trump Rally tonight in Reno, Nevada just pulled out again and attempted to shoot and kill Donald J. Trump.

VIDEO: #AskingPornStars: Sex Scene with Donald Trump or Hillary Clinton

While at Exxxotica Chicago, SINN & SKINN took the opportunity to sit down with porn stars Kissa Sins, Julia Ann, Bella Rose, Uma Jolie, Abella Danger, Cali Carter, Adriana Chechik, Tasha Reign, Alexis Fawx, Adria Rae, Jillian Janson, Anikka Albrite, Sara Jay and Carmen Valentina and ask, “Which presidential candidate would you prefer to do a sex scene with: Donald Trump or Hillary Clinton (and what kind of scene)?”

 

“I don’t know. I’d probably like to fuck Hillary Clinton with a strap-on. She seems like she deserves to be punished” – Adria Rae

“I would do one with Donald Trump where I step on his balls for 45 minutes.” – Kissa Sins

“Probably Hillary because I think she can lick p**** better. She looks like a girl that could eat p**** good!” – Carmen Valentina

Source: Hush-Hush

How will the Americans vote !? – Demographic Video Presentation

Video presentation of the candidates for US president 2016 and their supporters before the elections on 8th of November.


Give your support and Vote.

If you were to give your vote today - Who you will vote for ?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Police arrest man who says he destroyed Trump’s star on Walk of Fame (Video)

James Otis said he planned to turn himself in for damaging Donald Trump’s star on the Hollywood Walk of Fame.

But before doing that, he told media early Thursday, he would hold a news conference at the scene of the crime — where a replacement star had been installed.

L.A. police were having none of that. Hours before the planned event, officers from the Los Angeles Police Department’s Hollywood station arrested Otis on suspicion of smashing up the star.

Otis, a Beverly Hills resident, said he took a sledgehammer and pick to Trump’s star the day before, causing damage that police estimated at $2,500. The offense would be considered felony vandalism, police said.

In a phone interview with a Los Angeles Times reporter Wednesday, Otis spoke of his disdain for the Republican presidential candidate, business mogul and reality TV star.

Read more at: LAtimes

Fear of Trump: Bush, Obama and Clinton – all buying property in Non-Extradition countries

It appears Bill and Hillary Clinton are making plans to flee the country in the event Donald Trump wins this election.

Reports are circulating that the Clintons have transferred 1.8 Billion dollars from the Clinton Foundation to the Qatar Central Bank, via a facilitation/abatement of JP Morgan Chase & Company for reasons not revealed.

political-best-friends-carter-clinton-bush-obama

This move of such a large sum of money to the country of Qatar says in itself, Hillary Clinton knows she is going to lose the election, and she doesn’t plan to allow herself to be prosecuted for various high crimes and treason under a Trump Administration.

The country of Qatar happens to be one of a handful of countries that does not have an extradition treaty with the United States, thus would be a perfect place for her to run to in escaping justice.

Donald Trump has said many times during his campaign and at the Presidential debates that once he gets into office, he intends to prosecute her on various high crimes from her latest crimes of sending classified material via a personal e mail server. All the way to gun running to terrorist groups in Syria resulting in the deaths of 4 Americans in Benghazi.

Overpasses For America is a grassroots organization.
We dedicate this website to bringing you the hard to find truth in news.
The website is not free to operate, and we do not charge for its use.
If you would be so kind as to help offset our costs of operation by clicking an ad while you’re here, we would greatly appreciate it!
Thank you for visiting.
May God bless you and bless America.

Apparently, Hillary is not the only person in Washington who has made plans to escape justice under a Trump Administration. John Kerry has quietly been selling his property in the US for millions of dollars of late, with an announcement of the sale of his $25 million dollar Nantucket mansion in June 2016, as well as the sale of his yacht for $3.9 million in July 2016.

President Barack H Obama has also apparently been making exit plans with his purchase of a $4.9 million dollar seaside mansion in Dubai in January 2016, another non extradition country.

Snopes and other supposed fact checking sites have debunked both the story of Obama’s purchase of the mansion and the firing of Rear Admiral Rick Williams. However, over the last several months, these sites have been busted for lying in trying to debunk such information as the before mentioned, when in fact the information is true.

Snopes and other sites try their best to keep incriminating information from being believed, but the truth has a way of coming out on its own, as it always has.

The Bush family has been quietly.

Source: JewsNews

Christians For Trump – God’s Choice

Gloom and doom and presidential candidates

Christians for Trump – Now that the Republican primary has turned a corner with Ted Cruz dropping out, I have heard some “gloom and doom” words coming from Christians saying that now Hillary has won and our only choice is between the lesser of two evils, two immoral candidates.

I do not agree with the premise that we are choosing between two “immoral” people. In my estimation, there is clearly one candidate that clearly has no moral compass and that would be Hillary Clinton. The evidence is overwhelming and I really don’t have the stomach to go there right now.

As far as Donald Trump, someone is going to have to show me how he is so immoral and I have been studying everything he does and says for the last 10 months. Most Christians would point to his rudeness and his language and demeanor. If I applied that to many Christians I know, they would fail the test also. It’s not uncommon to hear the f-bomb or sh*t fly in a stressful situation even among Christians. Do I label them immoral? No. What are the evidences of Donald Trump’s immorality? I mean real evidence. Not just what the media has twisted around. Is it his kids? Do they reflect his immorality? You know what they say, the apple doesn’t fall far from the tree. Is it all the anecdotal and testimonial evidence of all his helping and giving to others? Maybe he was immoral when he said on national tv that he was proud to be a Christian and the Bible was the greatest book ever written. Or was he being immoral when he stated on national tv that if he was president he would take measures to protect Christians from being ridiculed and discriminated against? I, personally, have not heard many, if any, make these bold statements on national media. Donald Trump is not a perfect man, but then again there are NO perfect men.

christians-for-trump-7-1

Is Trumps Persona really as bad as his enemies say it is?

Christians For Trump – The bible says that we are known by our fruit. It’s only outsiders, those who don’t know him that criticize him. There is no criticism coming from those who know him, regardless of their race or sex.

People aren’t use to a man who just “lets it all hang out” as they use to say. Every word out of his mouth is unfiltered. He’s like a bull in a china shop but you know exactly who he is because he’s not hiding anything.

Somehow we think that a person like Hillary Clinton (or Obama) is more civil because she guards her words and doesn’t speak like Donald Trump, but you should speak with some of her (and Bill’s) secret service detail, like I have, and you would know that she’s a pro at slinging out every kind of nastiness out of her mouth like breathing. That’s called deception and dishonesty. I would much rather have a Donald Trump, a bull in a china shop, than someone who hides their true persona.

Please someone show me the case for the immorality of Donald Trump, keeping in mind that when God chose Paul(Saul), Paul was persecuting and murdering Christians. When God chose Moses, he had just murdered a man. When God had chosen David, He knew that David was a womanizer and had sent his mistress’ husband to battle to be killed.

God has never had the perfect man to use except for Jesus. God has always chosen the unqualified for His own reasons and THEN qualified them for the purpose he chose them for.

As for us, I guess we would have been complaining to God about Paul, saying what a poor choice God had made. Some things don’t change.

After all, how could a man endure all the attacks that this man endured from ALL sides and each attack only make him stronger if Gods hand was not on him. This is called favor. God’s favor is on him. There is no other explanation.

It’s funny how Christians pray and pray and pray for their country and when God sends someone to do something about it, they don’t recognize it, as if God just forgot about all those prayers or maybe He just didn’t hear them. Maybe God just doesn’t want to get involved in this 2016 election even though His followers cry out for help. Maybe God couldn’t get His candidate in, and instead, the devil got TWO of his candidates on the ballot.

It wouldn’t be the first time that we didn’t recognize an answer from God when it came. Remember what we did to His messiah when He came? Just because God doesn’t answer us in the way we think He will or expect Him to doesn’t invalidate that this is the answer God is giving us for the requests that we have made. I have had many personal prayers answered that didn’t come in the form I expected them to, and some were painful, but still answered my prayers.

God has clearly shown that His hand is on this man, Donald Trump. There is no other explanation for what has happened. He spent hardly any money on his campaign, comparatively, yet literally in the 100s of millions were spent to oppose him on ALL sides. He only became stronger. Only God can do this. Even Donald Trump is incapable of doing this on his own. As of right now, Trump is poised to break the all-time record of most votes EVER in a republican primary which is currently held by George W Bush. He is estimated to surpass Bush by up to 2 million. And contrary to the gloom and doom of many, there are experts who know about these things (one who has predicted presidential elections correctly for 104 years straight), not polls, that say that Donald Trump will run over Hillary Clinton in this election to a landslide victory.

Christians for Trump

As believers, we must entertain the possibility that God has chosen a candidate. He may not look like what we expected. He may not even act like what we wanted. Otherwise we must believe God is just not interested, doesn’t care, or doesn’t hear. If, indeed he has chosen one, we must trust that He knows what He’s doing. It’s called faith, believing without seeing.

Source: trumpvillereport

Donald Trump will Legalize Marijuana !?

Legalize Marijuana?

Touchy subject but I’m going to tackle it! I wonder how many people actually support legal marijuana in some form or the other?

Decades of research point to a variety of medical uses for this unique compound.

THC, or tetrahydrocannabinol, is the most recognized ingredient in cannabis. It is best known for causing the high that you get from using marijuana.

As a result, THC has also caused the most controversy surrounding the plant’s medical use, with many health professionals citing the high as a drawback.

Economically legalize marijuana

marijuana

All eyes were on Colorado to gauge the impact of the country’s first-ever state law to tax and regulate the sale and private use of marijuana for non-medical purposes. January 1, 2015, marked the first anniversary since marijuana became available for purchase for adults 21 and older in Colorado. For over two years, the state has also allowed adults to possess and cultivate limited amounts of marijuana.

What’s happening with tax revenue, crime rates, marijuana arrests, the economy, youth prevention and traffic safety? What’s working and where is their room for improvement? What effect is marijuana legalization having on neighboring states and throughout the country? Will Colorado’s legalization law have a ripple effect on the rest of the nation?

Here’s what we know so far: According to the state’s department of revenue, the first ten months of legal marijuana sales have resulted in nearly $40 million in tax revenue. Denver saw a decrease in violent crime rates in the first 11 months of 2014. Statewide traffic fatalities continue to decline, according to the Colorado Department of Transportation. Upwards of $8 million has been allocated to fund youth education and drug prevention efforts. And the state is enjoying economic growth and the lowest unemployment rate in years.

Jon Gettman’s 2007 study “Lost Taxes and Other Costs of Marijuana Laws” found that the U.S. marijuana industry is a $113 billion annual business that costs taxpayers $31.1 billion in lost tax revenues. Gettman, who has a Ph.D. in public policy from George Mason University, suggests that $10.7 billion could be saved each year from the country’s $193 billion in annual criminal justice expenditures if marijuana arrests – 5.54 percent of all criminal apprehensions – were stopped.

Last spring, more than 300 economists, including three Nobel Laureates, signed a petition supporting a paper by Harvard economist Jeffrey Miron, who argued the government could save $7.7 billion a year by not having to enforce marijuana prohibition. The report also found that taxing pot at rates comparable to those levied on tobacco and alcohol could raise $6.2 billion annually.That’s a total of $13.9 billion in savings and income.

50a5067be30cf-image

Economist Stephen Easton penned an article in Businessweek that suggested the financial benefits of pot legalization may be even bigger than what Miron predicted. Eatson guesses that legalizing the drug could bring in $45 to $100 billion a year.

marijuana2

 

Taxing Medical Marijuana Brings in Cash!

Although the above numbers are all speculative and admittedly somewhat disparate, there are some actual, hard figures reported by states and cities that have had medical marijuana laws in effect for some years. In 2011:

Oakland, Calif., collected $1.4 million in taxes from medical marijuana dispensaries – nearly 3 percent of all business tax revenue. The state of Colorado collected $5 million in sales taxes from the medical marijuana business. Denver collected $3.4 million from sales tax, application and license fees for its medical marijuana dispensaries (of which the city has more of than it has Starbucks coffee shops). Colorado Springs, Colo., collected more than $700,000 in taxes from the marijuana industry. Oregon raised an estimated $6.7 million in taxes which it used to pay for other state health programs.

Estimates for Washington: $2 billion in tax revenue will be raised over the next five years; for Colorado: $600 million in taxes and savings over the same time period.

Clinton’s stance, that she will not legalize marijuana. CEO of XEROX Ursula Burns participated in a Q&A with Clinton which later leaked. Ursula used Wall Street jargon to cover her use of the word “weed”. Clinton Campaign staffers have worked on removing these speech excerpts, and this was one of them:

URSULA BURNS: SO LONG MEANS THUMBS UP, SHORT MEANS THUMBS DOWN; OR LONG MEANS I SUPPORT, SHORT MEANS I DON’T. I’M GOING TO START WITH — I’M GOING TO GIVE YOU ABOUT TEN LONG-SHORTS.

HILLARY CLINTON: EVEN IF YOU COULD MAKE MONEY ON A SHORT, YOU CAN’T ANSWER SHORT.

URSULA BURNS: YOU CAN ANSWER SHORT, BUT YOU GOT TO BE CAREFUL ABOUT LETTING ANYBODY ELSE KNOW THAT. THEY WILL BET AGAINST YOU. SO LEGALIZATION OF POT?

HILLARY CLINTON: SHORT IN ALL SENSES OF THE WORD.”

Hillary Clinton is bankrolled by big pharmaceutical companies.

In the infographic below by OurAmazingWorld.org it shows the comparison of each candidate of the 2016 election. Hillary Clinton of course, being number one and Donald Trump being the very last.

Big Pharma

One of the main reasons the United States hasn’t legalized marijuana is due to the big power pharmaceutical companies have in our government. Once marijuana is legal, these companies will need to react to new forms of competition.

Donald Trump is pro-marijuana and promises to let states decide on legalization.

For marijuana supporters, the thought of voting for a Republican is bizarre. Donald Trump is the only hope for legalization. He stated recently that he wants to see it legalized and dealt with state by state instead of federally.

Trump’s whole movement is about Making America Great Again and recreating the culture of positivity all Americans once shared.

So if the legalization of Marijuana could help bring in billions of revenue, and can also help millions of patients, why is Hillary Clinton so against it? Simple Hillary Clinton is tied into the FDA scam of America a legalized marijuana would be very bad for the big drug companies!

Just think of the money America could make from taxation of legal marijuana. The money America would save on menial marijuana arrests and imprisonment, the court costs, the jail stays, that would add up real quick. Think about the money it would save instead of the high-priced pharmaceuticals used now, and a share of those high-priced pharmaceuticals are paid for by the government, through free medical insurance. It’d be like a booster jump-start to our economy.

But for me, it’d have to be the medical use that would be oh so important. I’ve watched several videos where children actually stop having life changing seizures time and time again. Or how cancer patients get an appetite or stop throwing up after treatment.

Did you ever stop to think maybe God put this plant here for a reason? Doesn’t the bible tell us in Genesis 1:29 King James Bible.

And God said, Behold, I have given you every herb bearing seed, which is upon the face of all the earth, and every tree, in the which is the fruit of a tree yielding seed; to you, it shall be for meat.

There was never any mention of marijuana in the Bible. But many assume it’s a sin. But then again the Bible has been interpreted so many ways, and no one man will ever know the true meaning of everything in the Bible. God said as much.

So are the Hillary Clinton’s of the World worried it’s immoral, or less money in their pockets?

Let’s see, Hillary clearly is for late-term abortion, or as I call it murder, and she clearly supports gay marriage, which the Bible tells us is an abomination of God.

I’m thinking it is the Big Money Pharmaceuticals in her pocket! How about you?

Source: Beverley Russell Trumpville Report

If you vote Trump, Obama is going to let the migrants in

The United States under president Obama’s wish would like to take 30% (percent) more refugees in 2017. This information was pass trough the Congress on Tuesday 25th of October from top administration officials, they are calling for the American people to do more on the global stage in the time when many voters are unwilling to accept the current pace.

obama-trump

This announcement looks like designed to boost Barack Obama’s hand for the next week, when he is scheduled to be a host at the summit of the U.N. General Assembly, discussing about international national leaders to start acting on the global refugee crisis.

In the US however, his refugee targets are likely to rise controversy again on the ability of the United States to accept and absorb new coming migrants – refugees especially from countries where terrorist cells and networks are operating to put insurgents into the refugee streams.

jeff-sessions-feature-hero

“The common-sense concerns of the American people are simply ignored as the administration expands its reckless and extreme policies”

Said Senator Jeff Sessions, Alabama Republican and chairman of the Senate Judiciary subcommittee on immigration.

Also Secretary of State John F. Kerry informed the congressional leaders, including Homeland Security and Human Services administration officials that part of the official consultation process must take place before the target gets into effect.

He also warns that he will let more of them if the Americans vote for Trump or Trump is being elected.